Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He may have narrated from his sheikhs what he was not followed upon, and he may have erred in some things.
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: I denied what I saw of these hadiths that I dictated, and he is one whose narrations are tolerated.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Truthful, poor memory
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Basti: Very much a denier of hadith, he narrates from the trustworthy what has no basis, and from the precise what he is not followed upon. He was a righteous man who narrated from his memory, very mistaken in what he narrates until the mistakes in his reports became widespread, so it would occur to the heart that he was the one who intended them. Therefore, he deserved to be abandoned.
Abu Umar ibn Jawsa: He considered him trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: He is not trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, makes many mistakes
Al-Daraqutni: Abandoned
Al-Dhahabi: And a group considered him mistaken
Dahim al-Dimashqi: There is nothing wrong with him
Sulaiman ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Dimashqi: Trustworthy
Abd al-Ghani ibn Said al-Azdi: He is nothing
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, it is as if Ahmad and Dahim did not understand his condition, and thought well of him because of his righteousness.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, and once: Weak, he is nothing