Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong (reliable) according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is among those whose hadiths are written, but I did not find in his hadiths any Munkar (rejected) hadith that exceeded the limit
Abu Bishr al-Dulabi: His hadiths are very Munkar (rejected), so do not write them
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He has no hadith that is followed
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in Hadith, his hadith is written, but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He reverses chains of narration and elevates mursal (broken chain) narrations
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He is not strong (reliable)
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He abandoned him (his narrations), and once said: He has some Munkar (rejected) narrations
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Abandoned in Hadith
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He is alright
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Do not occupy yourself with his hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
Al-Dhahabi: They weakened him
Salih ibn Ali al-Nawfali: He was accused of heresy
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was weak, not reliable, and once said: I abandoned his hadith
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: It is said that he was accused of heresy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: He was abundant in narration, but I did not see them using his hadith as evidence
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak, and once said: There is no problem with him, his hadith is written