Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Weak in Hadith
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: In my opinion, he is someone whose Hadith is acceptable to be written
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: He is acceptable
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His Hadith is written, he is not someone who fabricates Hadith, but his Hadith is not used as proof
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He did not know what he narrated, so he may have made mistakes in the narration until it seemed like it was fabricated, so he deserved to be abandoned
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Some people criticized him
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Some people criticized him
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is acceptable, except that Abu Dawud narrated some Munkar (rejected) Hadiths from him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: He is not strong, and once: Weak
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, but he has some mistakes
Al-Dhahabi: He authenticated him
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, but he makes mistakes
Sulaiman ibn Harb al-Azdi: He abandoned his Hadith
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Al-Walid considered him weak
The authors of Tahdhib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but considered
Hisham ibn 'Abd al-Malik al-Tayalisi: He weakened him, and once: His Hadith is not used as proof
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy