Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: There are munkar (rejected) hadiths in his narration, many of his hadiths are not supported by others
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His position is of truthfulness, his hadith is written, but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: Upright in hadith
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: Saduq (truthful)
Abu Nu'aym al-Fadl ibn Dukin: There is that negligence in him as it was
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful), there is leniency in him
Al-Dhahabi: They considered him trustworthy
Khalaf ibn Salim al-Mukharrami: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: He weakened him
Zuhair ibn Harb al-Nasai: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Numayr: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Saduq Hasan al-Hadith, but he descended from the rank of Thiqah to the rank of Hasan al-Hadith because of the munkar (rejected) hadiths in his narration, otherwise he would have been Thiqah, so adding 'there is leniency in him' is not good after saying Saduq, it is closer to authentication, he lost, and a group narrated from him, and only al-Saji weakened him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Thiqah (trustworthy)