Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: The leading Imams considered him weak and his hadith are weak
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: He is not strong, and once, regarding the knowledge of hadith, he said: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Lenient in hadith, he narrates from Ata' what no one else narrated from him, and he is weak in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was one of those who became confused at the end of his life until he did not know what he was narrating. So, his later hadith, which contain delusions and fabrications, became mixed with his great hadith, which contain authentic narrations from famous people. Therefore, it is not permissible to use him as a proof.
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Lenient in hadith
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: He is weak in hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His hadith are worthless, he is confused in hadith
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy, and once said: His hadith are abandoned
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Juzajani: His hadith are not accepted
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Weak, he became confused at the end of his life, and he was a worshipper
Dawud al-Attar: He was a worshipper and he has hadith, and he is weak
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Very weak in hadith, he narrated fabrications, and he was a devout worshipper
Ali ibn al-Junayd al-Razi: His hadith are abandoned
Muhammad ibn Sahnun al-Maghribi: He weakened him
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Weak
Muhammad ibn 'Amr al-Mawsili: Weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: We did not abandon him because of the hadith of 'Amr ibn Shu'ayb, but because of the confusion in his mind
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and he once said: Weak, his hadith are written down but not abandoned, and once: Weak, he is nothing, and once: Weak, and once: He was a righteous man in himself and in hadith, but not that much