Abu Ahmad ibn Adi Al-Jurjani: Most of his narrations from Abu al-Zubayr are many, and the trustworthy ones agree with him on them from Abu al-Zubayr, and some of them they do not agree with him on.
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Shaykh, and what Ibn Ma'in said about him is not true, for the two Imams, Bukhari and Muslim, agreed to include his hadith, and relied on it, as did all the other muhaddiths.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban Al-Busti: He is one of those who narrate from the trustworthy what does not resemble the hadith of confirmation, so he went beyond the limit of relying on him if he narrates alone, and I hope that whoever considered him in what he agreed with the trustworthy was not criticized in his doing so.
Abu Dawud Al-Sijistani: A righteous man, and once: weak, and once: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There is nothing wrong with his hadith
Ahmad ibn Shuayb Al-Nasa'i: He is not strong, as Al-Mizzi narrated from him
Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani: Trustworthy, he has some strange narrations
Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi: He was a scholar of genealogy
Al-Daraqutni: He is trustworthy
Al-Dhahabi: He is trustworthy in the eighteenth class of the history of Islam
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, good in hadith, and the two Sheikhs relied on him in their Sahihs
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing