Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He narrates from Anas strange and unacceptable hadiths. Most of what he narrates about the virtues of Ali is weak and unacceptable. However, he is extreme in his Shi'ism.
Abu al-Arab al-Qayrawani: He narrates unacceptable hadiths that no one else narrates from Anas. However, he is famous because many people narrated from him.
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He mentioned a fabricated hadith of his and said that he is the one accused of it.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: His hadiths are unacceptable, most of them are not known except from him.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Very weak in hadith, unacceptable hadith, I don't know of a single authentic hadith from him.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He has a book that we copied from him, most of which is fabricated. He is very unacceptable in hadith, he narrates from Anas what is not from his hadith, and I don't think he heard anything from him. Therefore, it is not permissible to use his narrations as evidence, even if they agree with the trustworthy narrators, so what about when he narrates unique reports?
Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: Abandoned in hadith
Al-Dhahabi: Alas
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: Unacceptable in hadith, and once: he is questionable.