Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not considered strong by them
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: He is closer to weak than otherwise. He was accused of Shi'ism, and a group considered him weak. The effect of weakness is evident in his narrations, and Thawr ibn Yazid al-Shami is more reliable than him
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: They considered his hadith, he was accused of Shi'ism
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to change the chains of narration until things appeared in his narration as if they were fabricated
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is not trustworthy
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He is not that strong
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He was not criticized except for Shi'ism
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He was asked about Thawr ibn Abi Fakhtah, Layth ibn Abi Salim, and Yazid ibn Abi Ziyad? He said, how close are they to each other?
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy, and once: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He is fine, and once: His hadith is written, and he is weak
Ayyub ibn Abi Tamimah al-Sakhtyani: He was not upright in character
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Weak in hadith, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak, accused of Shi'ism
al-Daraqutni: Abandoned
al-Dhahabi: Alas
Sufyan al-Thawri: He was one of the pillars of lying
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: He used to criticize him
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: Do not narrate from him
Ali ibn al-Junayd al-Razi: Abandoned
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Do not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, and once: Weak, and once: They weaken his hadith, he is nothing to them
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Lenient in hadith
Yunus ibn Abi Ishaq al-Sabi'i: He was a Shi'ite