Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has hadiths from reliable people, in some of his hadiths no one follows him except that he did not rely on lying, but there was negligence in it and his hadith is confused as mentioned by al-Bukhari
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: He made many mistakes, but people who missed hadiths that were with him, or a stupid man, narrated from him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: On the authority of Adl, like al-Qasim ibn Abi Shabah, and once: weak hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to change the chains of narration and raise the mursals. Yahya al-Himmani corrupted him until it became invalid to argue with his straight hadiths because of what was mixed with them from the widespread things about him that have no basis. So he went out with them from the limit of modification to the injury
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: I did not write from him, in his hadiths there are denials, and he was a righteous man
Abu Zur`ah al-Razi: He does not deliberately lie, the hadith is placed for him and he reads it
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Some of his hadiths are fabricated and false
Ahmad ibn Shu`ayb al-Nasa’i: Weak
Ibn Hajar al-`Asqalani: He narrated from Kathir ibn Sulaym al-Razi a fabricated version
Al-Daraqutni: Abandoned
Al-Dhahabi: Weak
Salih ibn Muhammad Juzrah: He was a righteous man
Muhammad ibn Isma’il al-Bukhari: His hadith is confused
Muhammad ibn Sa’d, the scribe of al-Waqidi: He was weakening
Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Numayr: Truthful, and once: He is not one of those who lie with me, the hadith was placed for him, so he narrated it, and he was not one of those who deliberately lied with me, and once he said: Trustworthy
Muslim ibn al-Qasim al-Andalusi: Trustworthy, God willing
Nasr al-Kindi: Jabalah was originally truthful, except that Ibn al-Himmani corrupted his book
Yahya ibn Mu`in: Liar