Abu Ahmad Ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His hadiths are Hasan (good), unique and unusual. I have excused him for what they criticized him for, and he is fine in my opinion, and his narrations are acceptable, given that Ahmad and Yahya considered him trustworthy.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Salih (righteous), his hadith can be written down, but he should not be relied upon as a proof.
Abu Hatim Ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrated few hadiths. He is munkar al-riwayah (rejected in narration) in what he narrates. It is not permissible to use his knowledge as an argument if he narrates alone.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: La ba's bihi (There is nothing wrong with him). His hadith is upright.
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ahmad Ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: He is not strong. And once: There is nothing wrong with him.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful), he makes mistakes.
Zakariya Ibn Yahya al-Saji: Da'if (weak)
Abbas Ibn 'Abd al-'Azim al-'Anbari: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ali Ibn al-Madini: He was considered Thiqah (trustworthy) by us.
Muhammad Ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He has a hadith that is not corroborated.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Saduq (truthful) Hasan (good) al-Hadith
Yahya Ibn Ma'in: Salih (righteous). And once: Thiqah (trustworthy), there is nothing wrong with him.
Ya'qub Ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Thiqah (trustworthy)