Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: His hadith is nonsensical
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: All his hadiths are either denounced in text or chain of narration, generally his hadith is not preserved, and I fear that he is weak, and he is closer to weakness
Abu al-Arab al-Qayrawani: He is weak
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He is weak
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak in hadith
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He does not establish the hadith, he narrates falsehoods from the Imams, al-'Uqayli called him: Hafs ibn Umar ibn Maymun al-Adani
Abu Hatim al-Razi: A lying sheikh, and once: Lenient in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He twists the narrations and attaches weak texts to sound chains of narration, and he intentionally takes a narration known from one path and brings it from another path that is not known. He narrated from Ibn Abi Dhi'b and Ibrahim ibn Sa'd, and Yazid ibn 'Ayyash and Malik ibn Anas, and once: It is not permissible to rely on him if he narrates alone
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is not reliable, and once: Denier of hadith
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Alas
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He was with Hammad in those calamities
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He writes his hadith and he is weak in hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
Al-Daraqutni: Weak, and once: He is not strong in hadith, and once: Abandoned
Al-Dhahabi: They weakened him
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: He lies
Malik ibn 'Isa al-Qafsi: He is not reliable
Muhammad ibn Hammad al-Tusi: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is not trustworthy, and once: He was a bad man, and in a narration by Ibn Mahriz, he said: He is not reliable