Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has other hadiths than what I mentioned, and in my opinion, there is nothing wrong with his hadith. What is considered objectionable in his hadith comes from the narrators who narrated from him. Malik narrated from him, and that is enough for his truthfulness. If someone like Malik narrates from him, then Ahmad and Yahya said: "We do not mind if we do not ask about those who narrated from Malik."
Abu Hatim al-Razi: There is nothing wrong with him.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Abu Zar'a al-Dimashqi: One of the trustworthy narrators
Abu Zar'a al-Razi: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, and once: He is not strong in hadith.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: There is nothing wrong with him, once: Ahmad's opinion about him differed. Ibn Adi said the criticism came from others, not from him.
Ibn Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: Trustworthy
Al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Sufyan ibn Uyainah: He was the most devout and pious of them.
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: Trustworthy, truthful
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: A trustworthy Tabi'i (successor) who narrated many hadiths
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Not trustworthy, and once: Trustworthy, and once: Not strong, and may be acceptable, and once: Weak
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Fasawi: Trustworthy