Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: People and imams narrated from him, and his hadiths are upright. What Yahya al-Qattan mentioned that Muhammad ibn Sirin did not approve of him, I do not know his reason. Perhaps he did not approve of him in another sense, not hadith. As for hadith, there is nothing wrong with him or his narrations.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy, Abu Hatim al-Razi explained the reason why Ibn Sirin did not approve of him, because he was involved in some work of the Sultan.
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Trustworthy, reliable
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He considered him trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: A trustworthy scholar, Ibn Sirin hesitated about him because of his involvement in the work of the Sultan. Once: He was cited as evidence by the group.
Qatada ibn Di'amah al-Sadusi: There was no one in Basra more knowledgeable than Hamid ibn Hilal, except al-Hasan and Ibn Sirin.
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sirin al-Basri: He did not approve of him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: One of the trustworthy