Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Hanash narrated a number of hadiths from Ali and he is known among the companions of Ali and famous for it, and I do not think that he narrates from anyone other than Ali and that there is nothing wrong with him because the one who narrates from him is only Samak ibn Harb and al-Hakam in Utaybah and there is nothing wrong with them
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Samak narrated a rejected hadith from him
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Not strong
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Acceptable, but I do not see them using his hadith as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He made many mistakes in narrations. He narrates uniquely from Ali things that do not resemble the hadiths of the trustworthy, so he became among those whose hadiths are not used as evidence
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, not corroborated
Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm al-Zahiri: Dropped, rejected
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful but he has some mistakes and narrates mursal hadiths
Ali ibn al-Madini: I don't know him
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: They criticize his hadith
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, considered in corroborations
Yaqub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: There is nothing wrong with him