Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Abandoned in Hadith
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: Among those whose hadiths are written down, but in my opinion, if he contradicts the chain of narration or the text, then he is mistaken and does not intend to lie. If he narrates a rejected hadith, then the blame lies with the one who narrated it from him, so he is weak and not among those who intentionally lie.
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Not a Haafiz (scholar who has memorized a vast number of hadiths)
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is confused in Hadith, not strong. His hadiths are written down but not used as evidence, like Muslim ibn Khalid al-Zunji. He was not in a position to lie.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to practice tadlis (concealing a weak narrator in the chain of narration) from Ghiyath ibn Ibrahim and others, and he narrates what he hears from them, including what they fabricated on the trustworthy narrators from the trustworthy narrators whom he saw. It is not permissible to use his narrations as evidence. And once:
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak. And once: Not reliable. And once: Kharijah entrusted his books to Ghiyath ibn Ibrahim, who corrupted them for him.
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He was not criticized except for his narrations from unknown narrators. But if he narrates from trustworthy, established narrators, then his narration is acceptable.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His hadiths are not written down.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak. And once: Not trustworthy. And once: Abandoned in Hadith.
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He was accused of Murji'ism (belief that faith is simply belief in the heart, and actions are not necessary).
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Abandoned in Hadith. He used to practice tadlis from liars.
Al-Daraqutni: Weak
Al-Dhahabi: He considered him unreliable (Waah)
Al-Fadl ibn Musa al-Sinani: He considered him unreliable (Waah)
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: Abandoned in Hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: He is considered weak by us.
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He used to practice tadlis from Ghiyath ibn Ibrahim, and his authentic hadiths cannot be distinguished from his other narrations.
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: People were cautious of his hadiths, so they abandoned him.
Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah al-Makhrami: How can I narrate from a man whose hadiths are considered rejected and denounced? I have seen from him leniency in some matters, so I am not sure if his approach to Hadith was like that.
Wakee' ibn al-Jarrah: He abandoned him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Not trustworthy. And once: Not reliable. And once: Weak. And once: A liar and not reliable.
Yahya ibn Yahya al-Laythi: Kharijah, in our view, is upright in Hadith, and we did not used to reject his hadiths except for what he narrates through tadlis from Ghiyath.
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: I hear our companions weakening him.
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sudosi: His hadiths are weak according to all of our companions.