Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: I have not seen in his hadiths except that which is probable in narration or that which is narrated by a weak narrator from him, so the blame is on the weak narrator, not him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He narrates Munkar hadiths
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Truthful in narration, but he makes many mistakes, and in his hadith there are Munkar narrations. I do not see a problem with using him as a reference if he narrates alone from his father
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak, and once: Abandoned in Hadith
Abu Zur'a al-Dimashqi: Trustworthy
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is not anything. He refused to lie about his father, so he lied about the Companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalili: He considered him trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Masri: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak, although he was a jurist
al-Daraqutni: Weak
al-Dhahabi: They considered him weak
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: From the narration of al-'Abbas, who said: He is not anything. And once: Weak. He refused to lie about his father, so he lied about the Companions. His book "al-Diyat" should be buried
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Weak