Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He did not care much for Hadith, and the people of Hadith did not need to include his Hadith.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was a Murji'ite and called to it, and he was the first to refute the people of Medina and support his companion, meaning al-Nu'man. He was intelligent but had nothing in Hadith, and he narrated from trustworthy narrators but erred in it. When his error became excessive, he deserved to be abandoned due to his many mistakes because he called to their doctrine.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Nothing, his Hadith should not be written, he does not deserve to be abandoned.
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Muhammad ibn al-Hasan was a Jahmite.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He followed the Jahmite doctrine, and he was: Opposed to the narrations. And once: I do not narrate anything from him. And once: He is nothing, and his Hadith should not be written.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is lenient due to his memorization.
Al-Ahwas ibn al-Mufaddal al-Ghulabi: Weak.
Al-Daraqutni: He does not deserve to be abandoned.
Al-Dhahabi: One of the seas of knowledge and jurisprudence, strong in his possession.
Al-Mufaddal ibn Ghassan al-Ghulabi: Weak.
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Muhammad ibn al-Hasan used to hold the belief of Jahm and was a Murji'ite.
Ali ibn al-Madini: Truthful.
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: Weak.
Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi'i: He considered him as evidence.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He used to accuse him of lying. And once: A Baghdadi, weak. And once: He is nothing, and his Hadith should not be written. And once: A Jahmite liar.
Ya'qub ibn Ibrahim al-Qadi: He lies about Ali.