Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not considered strong by them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has some acceptable hadiths, and I did not see in his hadiths anything objectionable that exceeds the limit if a trustworthy narrator narrates from him. Although Dawud is not strong in hadith, his hadiths are written down and accepted if narrated by a trustworthy person
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: He is not trustworthy
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is not strong, they speak about him
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He is among those who believe in the Return
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak in Hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'aib al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jilani: His hadith is written down, but he is not strong
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: Abandoned, weak
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, but he makes mistakes
Shu'bah ibn al-Hajjaj: He used to narrate strange things from him
Amr ibn Shurahil al-Sha'bi: He used to say to him and Jabir al-Ja'fi: 'If I had authority over you two and I found nothing but needles, I would pierce you with them and then bury you'
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He did not narrate from him
Ali ibn al-Madini: I do not narrate from him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Close to being acceptable in Hadith
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He did not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak, and once: 'His hadith is nothing,' and once: 'He is not strong'