Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Trustworthy and reliable
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Good, his place is truthfulness
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Trustworthy
Abu Ya'la al-Khalili: Trustworthy, narrated mostly from Malik, and Imams narrated from him
Ahmad bin al-Furat al-Razi: Twelve or thirteen men criticized Ruh bin Ubadah, but their criticism was not accepted
Ahmad bin Hanbal: There was nothing wrong with him, and he was not accused of anything
Ahmad bin Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not strong
Ahmad bin Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: A trustworthy scholar with several books, one time: one of the Imams, and all the Imams relied on him, some criticized him without evidence
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: He was abundant in Hadith, and he was trustworthy
Al-Dhahabi: The Haafidh, he wrote books and was one of the scholars
Zuhayr bin Harb al-Nasa'i: The most I saw from him is that he once narrated a Hadith, and Ibn al-Madini corrected a name for him, so he erased it from his book and wrote what he said. I say this shows his fairness
Uthman bin Muslim al-Saffar: He did not like the matter of Ruh bin Ubadah
Muhammad bin Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, God willing
Mas'ud bin Ahmad al-Harithi: Twelve men criticized him, but their criticism was not accepted
Hisham bin Abd al-Malik al-Tayalisi: I never saw him with any scholar, and he was a paper merchant
Yahya bin Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, truthful, his Hadiths indicate his truthfulness, and one time: Truthful, trustworthy, and it was said to Yahya bin Ma'in: They claimed that Yahya bin Sa'id al-Qattan used to criticize him, he said: False, Yahya al-Qattan did not criticize him at all
Ya'qub bin Shaybah al-Sadusi: He was very abundant in Hadith, truthful, and he said: I said to Ibn Ma'in, they claimed that Yahya al-Qattan used to criticize him, he said: False, he did not criticize him