Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: It is as if his hadiths have reversed isnads and reversed texts, and most of what he narrates is not corroborated. His hadith is written with its weakness.
Abu al-Husayn ibn al-Munadi: I abandoned his hadith.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His place is truthfulness.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He makes many mistakes in reports and is widely mistaken in narrations, although there is some truth in him. My opinion of him is to consider his narrations that agree with the trustworthy narrators and avoid those he narrates alone.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, he was a righteous man.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: He has a rejected hadith from Malik, and once he said: 'He is not that strong.'
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: His hadith is written, but he is not strong.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, but with many delusions, and weak.
Al-Dhahabi: There is weakness in him.
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Very delusional.
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He has mursal (without a chain) narrations and delusions, his hadith is written.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but considered.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once he said: 'Truthful.'