Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He may be confused in some of what he narrates, I hope that his hadith is acceptable
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: A virtuous Yemeni sheikh who resided in Mecca
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in hadith, and he is weak according to all of them
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He is confused and does not know, he makes mistakes and does not understand, so much so that mistakes prevail in his hadith, which he narrates from famous people
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak, I do not include his hadith
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Lenient and weak in hadith, his hadith on the authority of al-Zuhri is as if he is narrating munkar
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He is not one of the abandoned whose hadith is not accepted
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak in hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not strong, he makes many mistakes about al-Zuhri, once: Weak
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Reliable
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: He is not an argument in rulings
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He narrated from him then abandoned him
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: There is weakness in his hadith, but his hadith is acceptable despite the weakness in it
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzayma: There is something in my heart about him, once: I am innocent of his covenant
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He narrates many munkar hadith and makes many mistakes, he contradicts himself in his hadith, and once: I do not narrate anything from him and I do not think he lies but he makes many mistakes
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak in hadith, and once: On the authority of Ja'far ibn Aban: Weak, and once: On the authority of Abbas al-Dawri: He was not strong and his hadith is more acceptable than Salih ibn Abi al-Akhdar