Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has many hadiths, some of which are narrated from him by weak people, so the blame is theirs, not his, and he is among the weak narrators whose hadiths are written down.
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He mentioned him in his topics in the chapter on the virtue of cupping.
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Acceptable
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in Hadith, his Hadith is written down but not used as evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates from Anas fabricated things that have no basis, so much so that it occurs to the heart that he is the one who fabricated them, and it is not permissible to use his narration as evidence, and I do not write it down except as a lesson.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Not that strong
Abu Zar'a al-Razi: Not strong, his Hadith is weak
Abu Nu'aym al-Isbahani: There is leniency in him.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Acceptable
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jilli: Weak in Hadith, not reliable
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Reliable
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Hasan ibn Sufyan al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy
al-Daraqutni: Acceptable
al-Dhahabi: There are differences of opinion regarding his authentication, but the majority consider him weak.
Shu'ba ibn al-Hajjaj: His memory was not considered good
Ali ibn al-Madini: Weak according to us
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Weak in Hadith
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Not reliable, and once: Acceptable, and once: His Hadith is written down but he is weak, and once: Not reliable, and in the narration of Ibn Mahriz, he said: Weak. I said to Yahya: Narrate from Iyas from Anas. He said: Mu'awiya ibn Qurra.