Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: Among the trustworthy Muslims, whoever heard from him before his confusion, then that is authentic and valid.
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: He became very confused.
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: When he said, 'I heard' and 'He narrated to us,' he was reliable in what he said. And once: He became confused at the end of his life.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He became confused.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Before he became confused, he was trustworthy and the most knowledgeable of the people about the hadith of Qatada.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He became confused. He should not be relied upon except for what the early narrators narrated from him, and the narrations of those after him are considered.
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: One of the most reliable companions of Qatada. And once: He is fine, but he may have made mistakes. And once: Trustworthy.
Abu 'Awana al-Isfarayini: There was no one in our time who had a better memory than him.
Abu 'Isa al-Tirmidhi: He narrated from al-Bukhari, that he said: He heard from al-A'mash, but he practices tadlis and narrates from him.
Abu Muhammad al-Abnussi: Trustworthy, the Sheikhs considered him reliable, but he became confused and the period of his confusion lasted for more than ten years.
Abu Na'im al-Fadl ibn Dukin: I wrote from him two hadiths after he became confused.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He did not have a book, he memorized all his hadiths and he believed in predestination but kept it secret. And once: He narrated from people he had not heard anything from. And he entered Kufa twice before the defeat, so whoever heard from him in Kufa or before the defeat, his narration is good, said Ibn 'Adi.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy. Whoever heard from him after his confusion, it is not reliable.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: A trustworthy Qadari who did not call to his beliefs.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: A trustworthy Hadith scholar who had written works, he practiced tadlis a lot and became confused, and he was among the most reliable people regarding Qatada. Once: One of the great Imams and all the Imams considered him trustworthy, except that he was accused of believing in predestination.
al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy
al-Dhahabi: A prolific narrator, a scholar, a jurist of great stature.
Dahim al-Dimashqi: He became confused.
Sibṭ Ibn al-'Ajami: Famous for tadlis, more than one person mentioned it about him.
Sulayman ibn Dawud al-Tayalisi: The one with the best memory among the companions of Qatada.
Sulayman ibn Tarkhan al-Taymi: By Allah, I would not accept his testimony, by Allah, nor the testimony of his teacher Qatada.
Abd al-Baqi ibn Qaani' al-Baghdadi: He became confused at the end of his life, he was accused of believing in predestination.
Abd al-Latif ibn Ibrahim ibn al-Kayyal al-Shafi'i: One of the prominent trustworthy scholars, the Sheikhs considered him reliable.
Abd al-Wahhab ibn 'Ata al-Khaffaf: He became confused nine years before his death.
Ali ibn al-Madini: The one with the best memory of them about Qatada.
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzayma: The one with the best memory of his time.
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, with many hadiths, then he became confused at the end of his life.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy Hadith scholar who had written works, and his saying, 'he practiced tadlis a lot' here contradicts what he mentioned in Tabaqat al-Mudallisīn.
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He considered him trustworthy, and he used to say: Whoever heard from him before the defeat, his narration is valid. The defeat was in the year 145 AH. And once: I do not mind if I write the hadith from Sa'id or Hisham or Shu'ba, I do not repeat the hadith of one of them to the other. And once: He did not hear from Hammad, nor from Abu Bishr, nor from Hisham ibn 'Urwa, nor fr
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy. And once: One of the most reliable people regarding Qatada. And once: He became confused in the year 142 AH, and whoever heard from him after that, it is not reliable. And once: Which of them is more preferable to you regarding Qatada, Sa'id or Hisham? He said: Sa'id is trustworthy and reliable, and Hisham is trustworthy.