Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Hasan al-Hadith, upright, trustworthy, acceptable Hadith
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: Sa'eed ibn Salim ibn Abi al-Hayfa' al-Qaddah al-Makki was among those who exaggerated in irjaa' and there are concerns in his Hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His place is of truthfulness
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He held the belief of irjaa' and had concerns in narrations, to the point he would change them, which made him outside the bounds of being relied upon
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy but leans towards irjaa'
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He tends towards truthfulness
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He believes in irjaa' and is not an authority
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Trustworthy, makes mistakes, knowledgeable, and was accused of irjaa'
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Weak
Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi: He is not that great in Hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was trustworthy, but not very strong
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: From Khurasan, resided in Mecca, believed in irjaa'
Muhammad ibn 'Abdullah al-Hakim: Murji'
Muhammad ibn 'Ajlan al-Madani: Murji'
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Saduq Hasan al-Hadith, Ya'qub ibn Sufyan, al-Darimi, and Ibn Hibban criticized him for his view on Abu Hanifa, in fact some of them clearly stated that
Yahya ibn Ma'in: From the narration of Abbas and Ibn Abi Maryam who said: There is nothing wrong with him. From the narration of Uthman ibn Sa'id who said: Trustworthy. In the narration of Ibn Mahriz who said: There was nothing wrong with him, trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He has a bad opinion and is a caller to something reprehensible, his Hadiths are disliked