Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has strange and unique hadiths, and I hope that he is one of those who do not intentionally lie and fabricate, neither in narration nor in text. Perhaps he only aims to connect one thing to another, and his narrations are acceptable and bear scrutiny.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Truthful, trustworthy
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was a devout and righteous worshiper
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, from the noble people
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A righteous man, but he did not excel in hadith. And once: He is not strong in hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Truthful, but he has some mistakes
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, but he has some mistakes
al-Daraqutni: He is one of the trustworthy
Muhammad ibn 'Amr al-Mawsili: Trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He considered him trustworthy