Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has strange and good hadiths, and I hope that they are upright. But what concerns me is that after a while, he raises a statement to the Prophet (may peace be upon him) while it is a statement of a companion, and he connects a mursal hadith as if it is connected.
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Thiqah (Trustworthy)
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates from Abd Allah ibn Amr and other trustworthy narrators fabricated things that make it seem to the one who hears them that he was the one who relied on them.
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He authenticated him, mentioned him in al-Mustadrak, and said: 'Thiqah (Trustworthy), Mamun (Reliable)'
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There is nothing wrong with him. And once: 'There is nothing wrong with him, his hadith is close.'
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him. And once: 'Thiqah (Trustworthy)'
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Thiqah (Trustworthy)
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (Truthful) with some mistakes. Ibn Hibban went too far in weakening him.
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: The most knowledgeable of people about him was Abd Allah ibn Wahb.
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: He narrates hadiths that are not supported by others.
Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Numayr: Thiqah (Trustworthy)
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Saduq (Truthful), Hasan al-Hadith (Good in Hadith). Al-'Ijli, al-Hakim, Ibn Ma'in, Ibn Numayr, and Musa ibn Harun authenticated him. Al-Nasa'i and Ahmad said, 'There is nothing wrong with him.'
Musa ibn Harun al-Hammal: He authenticated him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Thiqah (Trustworthy)
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He was the only one who weakened him, saying: 'He is lenient in hadith.'