Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Reliable, no problem with him, acceptable narrations. He narrated from a group of people on the authority of his father, and this indicates the man's trustworthiness.
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: Truthful, some of his hadiths are weak.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: Suwaylih, there is some leniency in him.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is written but not used as evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He makes mistakes.
Abu Hafs 'Umar ibn Shahin: This statement needs to be considered. In my opinion, they are both trustworthy and reliable.
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He was asked about Suhayl ibn Abi Salih and al-'Ala' ibn 'Abd al-Rahman, so he said: 'Suhayl is more similar and more famous, and his father is a little more famous.'
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: One of the pillars of hadith, his memory deteriorated at the end of his life.
Abu Ya'la al-Khalili: Trustworthy.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: How good his hadith is! He was asked: 'Is Suhayl more reliable than Muhammad in your view?' He said: 'Yes.' And once: 'He is more reliable than Muhammad ibn 'Amr.' And once: 'Trustworthy.'
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is no problem with him. And once: 'Abandoned hadith.'
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy. And he said once: 'He is one of the precise ones, and the mistakes in his hadith are only from those who narrate from him.'
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, his memory changed at the end of his life. Al-Bukhari narrated from him both in a connected and disconnected manner. Once: 'One of the well-known and prolific imams.'
Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: Trustworthy.
Al-Daraqutni: Weak.
Al-Dhahabi: He got sick, so his memory declined a little.
Al-Layth ibn Sa'd al-Misri: One of the worshippers of Medina.
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: We used to consider him reliable in hadith, trustworthy.
Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad al-Darawardi: He was afflicted with an illness that affected his mind and he forgot some of his hadith.
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was considered trustworthy by us.
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He had a brother who died, and he found him dead, so he forgot a lot of hadith.
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, narrated many hadiths.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy. Most of the imams considered him trustworthy, and major imams narrated from him. Muslim relied heavily on him in his Sahih.
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He became confused and changed.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: The people of hadith have always been cautious about his hadith. And once: 'Suwaylih, and there is some leniency in him.' And on the authority of 'Uthman ibn Sa'id, he said: 'He is considered better than him.' And on the authority of al-'Abbas, he said: 'His hadith is close to being acceptable. His hadith is not evidence, and he is not strong in hadith.' And once: 'He and his brothers are trustworthy.' And on the authority of Ali ibn al-Madini, he said: 'Muhammad ibn 'Amr is superior to him.' And he said...
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Fasawi: Weak, abandoned hadith.