Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He became blind in his old age, so he might have been dictated what was not from his hadith.
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jarjani: Closer to weakness.
Abu al-Hasan ibn Sufyan al-Kufi: Weak.
Abu al-Qasim al-Baghawi: Among the hadith scholars.
Abu Bakr al-A'in: Righteous in living, and a sheikh.
Abu Bakr al-Isma'ili: There is something in the heart about him regarding fabrication.
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: He changed in his old age and many fabrications appeared in his hadith.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Truthful but fabricates a lot.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates problematic hadiths from trustworthy narrators, his narrations should be avoided, in addition to the fact that he errs in narrations and alters reports.
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: As for his books, they are authentic, but when he narrates from his memory, no. He used to speak ill of Suwayd ibn Sa'id, and he said: 'I saw something from him that I didn't like.'
Abu Mu'awiya al-Darir: If he had books with him, then it's a big problem. He is nothing in my view.
Abu Ya'la al-Khalili: Trustworthy.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Good. Or he said: Trustworthy. And once: I don't know except good about him. And once: I hope that he is truthful. Or he said: There is no problem with him.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not trustworthy nor reliable.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy, among the most knowledgeable of people about 'Ali ibn Mushir.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful himself, except that he became blind and began to be dictated what was not from his hadith. Ibn Ma'in spoke very harshly about him.
al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: He might have been dictated what was not from his hadith. Whoever said they heard from him while he was sighted, then his hadith from him is good.
al-Daraqutni: He authenticated him.
al-Dhahabi: He was one of the vessels of knowledge, then he grew old and his memory declined. So, rejected hadiths came from his narration. And once: A noble hadith scholar with some rejected hadiths.
Sibṭ ibn al-'Ajami: More than one person said he fabricated a lot.
Salih ibn Muhammad Juzra: Truthful, except that he was blind, so he was dictated hadiths that were not his.
Ali ibn al-Madini: He is nothing. He criticized him for the hadith: 'Whoever falls in love, remains chaste, conceals it, and dies, then he is a martyr.'
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He is questionable. He had become blind and was dictated what was not from his hadith. He also said: Very weak.
Muslim ibn al-Qasim al-Andalusi: Trustworthy, trustworthy.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Suwayd died a while ago. He mentioned a hadith of his and said: 'Suwayd should be beheaded for it!' And once: 'If I had cavalry and men, I would go out to Suwayd ibn Sa'id until I seized him.' And once: 'He had nothing.' And once: 'His blood is permissible.' And once: 'What he narrated and wrote about is acceptable, but what he narrated and we received is not.' And once: He mentioned a hadith of his and said: 'False and he made it up.'
Ya'qub ibn Shayba al-Sadusi: Truthful but confused in his memorization, especially after he became blind.