Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Hopefully, he does not intentionally lie, but he may err in some of his hadiths.
Abu Bakr al-Barqani: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He errs in narrations and makes mistakes when narrating other than poetry. His unique narrations are not considered evidence, and his unsupported narrations are disregarded.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Not reliable
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: Not strong
Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm al-Zahiri: Weak
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: The eloquent narrator, truthful, but errs in hadith
Al-Daraqutni: Weak, and once: Abandoned
Al-Dhahabi: He is unknown, and once: They weakened him
Dhahaym al-Dimashqi: He is fine
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, but errs
Salih ibn Muhammad al-Jazara: Acceptable hadith
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Close to being acceptable
Muhammad ibn Abdullah al-Makhrami: Take from him, for he is too noble to lie.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Truthful, good hadith. The weakening of Ibn Hazm and al-Azdi is almost insignificant. Only Salih ibn Muhammad al-Baghdadi and al-Saji had a good opinion of him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Not trustworthy