Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Closer to weakness, and once: And in general, what he narrates is rejected.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in Hadith
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: There is leniency in him
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Follower, Madani, not accused
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi: Scholar of Maghazi
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, he became confused later in life
al-Daraqutni: Weak, but can be considered
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: There was no one in Madinah more knowledgeable of the Badriyyun than him, and he fell into need, so they were afraid if he came to a man asking him for something and he did not give it to him, he would say that his father did not witness Badr
Malik ibn Anas: Not trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Ishaq al-Muttalibi: He wondered about those who narrate from him, and once: We do not narrate anything from him
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: He remained until he became confused, and he was in dire need, but he is not relied upon
Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Dhi'b: Accused
Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah ibn al-Barqi: He weakens
Authors of Tahdhib al-Tahdhib: Weak, and we do not know of anyone who considered him trustworthy except Ibn Hibban
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, weak, and once: Weak, his hadith is written down, and once: He considered him trustworthy