Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Famous, from the people of Medina, Malik and others from the trustworthy narrated from him, and his narration, if a trustworthy person narrates from him, then there is nothing wrong with his narration, unless a weak person narrates from him
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: Not strong
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He may have made mistakes
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Abu Sulayman al-Khattabi: There is no hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari more ugly in appearance or more ugly in taste than Sharik's narration of the hadith of Isra
Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm al-Zahiri: He commented on the hadith of Isra, saying: It contains foreign words, and the harm is from it
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn al-Jarud: There is nothing wrong with him, and he is not strong
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, makes mistakes, and in the introduction to al-Fath, a group considered him authoritative, except that his narration from Anas for the hadith of Isra has strange places
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya: He asserted that in the hadith of Isra, which Sharik narrated, there are ten misconceptions
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: He used to be accused of believing in fate
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, narrated many hadiths
Muhammad ibn Tahir al-Qaysarani: He criticized the hadith of Isra because Sharik narrated it alone
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Truthful, good hadith, he was lowered to the rank of truthful because of his mistake in the hadith of Mi'raj
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Do not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Not strong, and once: There is nothing wrong with him