Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not considered strong by them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Not strong in Hadith, and he is among those whose Hadith is not used as evidence and whose religion is not followed
Abu al-Hasan ibn al-Qattan al-Fasi: I have not heard a convincing argument for weakening him
Abu Bishr al-Dulabi: His Hadiths do not resemble the Hadiths of people
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His Hadith is not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Among those who narrate problematic Hadiths from trustworthy narrators and reversed Hadiths from established ones
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He is okay
Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm al-Zahiri: Dropped
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Hasan (Good) in Hadith, and once: Trustworthy, and once: He is okay
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Weak
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, transmits many narrations and delusions
al-Daraqutni: His Hadith is included, and he mentioned him in al-Sunan and said: Not strong
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: There is weakness in him and he is not a Hafiz
Shu'bah ibn al-Hajjaj: I met him but did not consider him reliable
Salih ibn Muhammad Juzrah: No lie has been proven against him, and he was a man who practiced religious asceticism, except that he narrated Hadiths that he uniquely transmitted
Abd Allah ibn 'Awn al-Basri: They praised him, meaning they criticized him
Ali ibn al-Madini: I do not accept his Hadith
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: His Hadith is good and his status is strong
Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari: A knowledgeable, well-read scholar
Muhammad ibn 'Ammar al-Mawsili: I do not know anyone who said anything about him except Shu'bah. It was said: Is his Hadith considered evidence? He said: No
Musa ibn Harun al-Hammal: Weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He did not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: Upright
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: If Shahr is praised, then he is trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sudosi: Trustworthy, despite some criticism against him