Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Closer to weakness than to truth
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith may be written, but it is not used as evidence, and once he said: His place is truth, and he only denied destiny
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: One of those who narrate fabricated reports from the trustworthy, his narrations should not be used except when expressing astonishment
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: It is necessary to pause regarding him
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: Weak, and once he said: Lenient Qadari
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Not a Hafiz (scholar with exceptional memory)
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is nothing, he is weak in hadith, his hadiths are Munkar (rejected), his hadith is not worth anything, and once he said: Whatever of his hadith is Marfu' (attributed to the Prophet) is Munkar, and whatever of his hadith is Mursal (narrated from a Successor) from Mak'hul is easier, and he is very weak
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Masri: There is nothing wrong with him in my opinion
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak, and he said in al-Amali: Weak due to his memorization
Al-'Awza'i: Trustworthy
Al-Daraqutni: Weak
Al-Dhahabi: Weak from the scholars of Damascus
Dahim al-Dimashqi: Trustworthy, and once he said: Confused in hadith, weak, and once he said: He is okay
Sa'id ibn Abd al-'Aziz al-Tanukhi: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Very weak, and whatever of his hadith is Marfu' is Munkar
Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Numayr: Weak
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Nishapuri: Denier of Hadith
Muslimah ibn al-Qasim al-Andalusi: Denier of Hadith
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Weak in Hadith