Abu Ahmad bin Adi Al-Jarjani: I hope there is nothing wrong with him
Abu Hatim Al-Razi: There is nothing wrong with him, his Hadith is written
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His Hadith is not like that, he is less than Mukhariq bin Khalifah
Ahmad ibn Shuayb Al-Nasai: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: He is not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih Al-Jili: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ibn Hajar Al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful), he has some delusions, once: He has only one Hadith in Al-Bukhari
Al-Daraqutni: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Al-Dhahabi: They considered him trustworthy
Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Al-Barqi: They consider him trustworthy
Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Numayr: He considered him trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib Al-Tahdhib: Saduq (truthful) Hasan (good) Al-Hadith, the majority considered him trustworthy, and the phrase 'he has some delusions' has no meaning after reaching this rank
Yahya bin Said Al-Qattan: He is not stronger than Ibn Harmala in my opinion, and once: There is some weakness in his Hadith, he follows the same path as Ibrahim bin Muhajir
Yahya bin Ma'in: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Yaqub bin Sufyan Al-Faswi: Thiqah (trustworthy)