Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: There is an issue with his hadith in general, most of what he narrates is not followed
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He mentioned a hadith about the virtue of bread, then said: This is from his own doing
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: He is not strong, nor is he a حافظ (hafiz)
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: He is not strong, and in Shu'ab al-Iman, he said: Weak in hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong, lenient according to them
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates from the trustworthy what is not from their hadiths. It is not permissible to write down his hadith nor narrate from him except to express astonishment
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: Weak
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Noting, abandoned in hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Abandoned in hadith, and once: Not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Weak
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Not satisfactory in his hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Abandoned in hadith, and weak
Al-Dhahabi: They weakened him
Al-Daraqutni: He weakened him
Shu'bah ibn al-Hajjaj: He wrote from him
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He did not narrate from him
Ali ibn al-Junayd al-Razi: Abandoned
Ali ibn al-Madini: Weak, he is nothing
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Lenient according to them
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: He has many hadiths, very weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He did not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, weak, and in a narration by Ibn Mahriz he said: He is okay. And it was said to him: Who is more beloved to you: Wasil ibn Sa'id or Talha? He said: There is no one between them, I like them both