Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has authentic hadiths, and I did not find anything objectionable from him that exceeded the limit, neither in narration nor in text. I hope that there is nothing wrong with him, except that he is counted among the Shiites of Kufa, and he is, in my opinion, upright in narration and trustworthy.
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He accused him of fabricating a hadith in praise of Ali.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He narrated from al-Sha'bi confusing hadiths that cannot be followed.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is not strong, his hadith is not written down, nor is he cited as evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He did not understand what he was saying and would mix up names.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Ajlah narrated more than one objectionable hadith, how similar he is to Fitr ibn Khalifah.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak, not that much, and he had a bad opinion.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: Kufi, trustworthy, and once: acceptable hadith, but he is not strong in the number of sheikhs.
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: A liar
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Trustworthy Shiite
Al-Dhahabi: He included him in his book of those who were spoken about and he is trustworthy
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: Upright in narration, trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Very weak
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but can be considered
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: I have some reservations about him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Acceptable
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Trustworthy, his hadith is lenient