Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: People considered him, and despite his weakness, his hadith is written
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: His hadith is lenient
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak, and in Shu'ab al-Iman, not strong
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Rejected hadith, confused hadith, he does not have a hadith to rely on
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: Bad memorization, very delusional, extremely wrong, so he was abandoned because of his many mistakes
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: His hadith is not used as evidence, and it is not written
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Rejected hadith in origin, and his hadith is confused
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His hadith is weak, and once: It's not like that
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Weak, famous for weakness
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He's okay
Ibrahim ibn Yaqub al-Jawzajani: Weak in hadith
Ibn Abi 'Asim al-Nabil: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: He was not a hafiz, and once: He is not a hafiz, and once: Bad memorization, and once: He is abandoned and negligent
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Confused hadith
Sufyan ibn Uyainah: The sheikhs used to purify his hadith, and criticized his memorization
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He rejected his hadith most strongly
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Khurash: Weak in hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: We mentioned the weakness of Asim with Yahya al-Qattan
Malik ibn Anas: He did not narrate from him, and once: It is strange from Shu'bah that he selects men while he narrates from Asim
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah: I will not use him as evidence because of his bad memorization
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Rejected hadith
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: Many hadiths, but not used as evidence
Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Dhuhali: There is no analogy to Asim
Nur al-Din al-Haythami: Weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: I have something like Ibn 'Aqil
Yahya ibn Ma'in: His hadith is not evidence, and once: Weak
Yaqub ibn Shaybah al-Sadusi: People have narrated from him, and in his hadiths there is weakness, and he has rejected hadiths