Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: I did not mention any Hadith for him due to the large number of narrations he reports from Ali, both unique and unsupported by reliable narrators. Those who narrate from Asim are reliable, the problem lies with Asim, as he is not among those from whom narration is accepted.
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Acceptable in Hadith
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Not relied upon. And once: Not strong. He said in Ma'rifat al-Sunan wal-Athar: If he narrates a unique Hadith, it is not accepted from him, but it is mentioned as supporting evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He had a poor memory and made many mistakes. He frequently elevates the sayings of Ali. When this became excessive in his narrations, he deserved to be abandoned. However, he is in a better state than al-Harith.
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Asim is superior to al-Harith al-A'war, and he is an authority according to me.
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He mentioned a Hadith of his, then said: It is very rejected and contrary to what was narrated from him. Then he said: He contradicted the majority, so he narrated that in twenty-five with this.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Trustworthy
Al-Dhahabi: Average
Sufyan al-Thawri: We used to recognize the superiority of Asim's Hadiths over the Hadiths of al-Harith.
Ali ibn al-Madini: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, and he has Hadiths.
Muhammad ibn Ammar al-Mawsili: More reliable than al-Harith.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy Shi'a