Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Most of his hadiths are plagiarized from the trustworthy, and some are unique to him
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: His hadith is rejected
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: There are errors in his hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is acceptable, I see nothing wrong with his hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates fabricated hadiths from trustworthy narrators, it is not permissible to write down his hadiths except in amazement
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He rejects a lot
Abu Nu'aym al-Asbahani: Nothing
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, he was not a liar, he narrated from him and spoke well of him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy, and once: Weak
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Knowledgeable in history, abandoned in hadith, Ibn Ma'in went too far in accusing him of lying
Al-Daraqutni: He is abandoned in my opinion, and once: Weak
Al-Dhahabi: He said in al-Mizan: Perhaps what Ahmad ibn Hanbal narrated from someone else was a mistake
Al-Zubayr ibn Bakkar: A scholar of hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: He criticized him and rejected his hadith
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Malik al-Tabban: He is not trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: A liar, wicked, enemy of Allah, and once: Weak