Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: His hadith is not established
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I denied in his narrations a number of hadiths, and he, despite his weakness, writes his hadiths
Abu Bishr al-Dulabi: Abandoned in Hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Denounced in Hadith, weak in Hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: When he narrated on the authority of Khalid al-Hadha' and Yunus ibn Ubayd and Shu'bah ibn al-Hajjaj, he brought from them things that resembled their authentic hadiths, and when he narrated on the authority of Anbasah ibn Abd al-Rahman and al-Qasim ibn Abd al-Rahman and the people of Kufa, he brought things that did not resemble the hadith of the trustworthy, as if he was narrating on the authority of the Basrans from his book and on the authority of the Kufis from his memory, so he erred
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is not anything
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He is not truthful, denounced in Hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: In the narration of Ahmad ibn Asram al-Mazni: He narrated a hadith similar to the subject and considered him weak in it and did not praise him, and in the narration of Abdullah ibn Ahmad: I did not deny from his hadith except a hadith on the authority of Sa'id on the authority of Qatada, and he mentioned the hadith. As for his hadith on the authority of Yunus, Khalid, Dawud and Sa'id, it is authentic. I do not see anything wrong with his hadith except this hadith, the hadith of Sa'id. It is in my opinion like
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Abandoned in Hadith, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Abandoned in Hadith
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Abandoned in Hadith
Al-Daraqutni: A weak Mosuli
Al-Dhahabi: Oh, and once: Weak in Hadith
Abdullah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal: My father did not hear from him and forbade me to write from a man on his authority
Ali ibn al-Madini: His hadith is gone
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Denounced in Hadith
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Naysaburi: Denounced in Hadith
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is not trustworthy, and once: He is not anything, and in the narration of Ibn Mahriz, he said: He was not trustworthy, and he fabricated a hadith for Harun, meaning al-Rashid, on the authority of Qatada, on the authority of Jabir ibn Zayd, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, regarding the rulers. There was nothing wrong with him except that he fabricated this hadith