Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not reliable according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Most of what he narrates contradicts that, and weakness is evident in his narrations
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: A righteous man with some odd narrations about az-Zuhri
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Very rejected in Hadith, weak in Hadith, not in the place of lying
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Poor in memorization, from those who bring problematic narrations from trustworthy narrators. It is not permissible to use him as evidence except in what agrees with the trustworthy narrators
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak, and once: Not trustworthy, and once: Rejected in Hadith
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Flimsy in Hadith, and once: Weak in Hadith, not strong
Abu Sa'id ibn Yunus al-Misri: Rejected in Hadith
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Weak
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not trustworthy, and once: Weak
Ibrahim ibn Ishaq al-Harbi: Others are more reliable than him, and he used to meet him
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Weak in Hadith, and I have not heard anyone mention any innovation from him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: Abandoned
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was nothing
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He has odd narrations, and once: He is not strong according to them
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah ibn al-Barqi: He mentioned him in the chapter of those whose narrations are mostly dominated by errors
Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Dhuhali: Very weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: In the narration of Abbas al-Dawri, he said: Weak, and once: He is nothing, and his Hadith is not to be written