Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is fine in himself, but they criticized him for his many narrations on the authority of Shahr, and Shahr is weak
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: A group of scholars narrated from him and considered his hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is fine, his hadith is written but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: His hadith is considered if he narrated from trustworthy narrators
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His hadith on the authority of Shahr is close (to being acceptable), and once: A trustworthy sheikh
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Misri: Trustworthy, I like his hadith, his hadiths on the authority of Shahr are authentic
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: He criticized Salih ibn Muhammad al-Jazara for weakening him
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, important
Shu'ba ibn al-Hajjaj: Truthful, except that he narrates on the authority of Shahr, and once: Abd al-Hamid ibn Bahram is a good sheikh, but do not write from him because he narrates on the authority of Shahr ibn Hawshab
Salih ibn Muhammad al-Jazara: He is nothing, he narrates on the authority of Shahr, he has a rejected book. Al-Khatib said the burden of the book is on Shahr
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was considered trustworthy by us, but he narrates on the authority of Shahr ibn Hawshab from a book he had
Ali ibn Yahya al-Maliki: Whoever wants the hadith of Shahr, then let him go to Abd al-Hamid ibn Bahram
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Whoever wants the hadith of Shahr, then let him go to Abd al-Hamid ibn Bahram
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, he has a book about Shahr ibn Hawshab