Abu Ahmad al-Hakam: Not considered strong by them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adī al-Jurjani: As mentioned by al-Bukhari, he narrated uniquely from al-Awza'i without any hadith narrated by anyone else but him, and he is among those whose hadiths are written
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy, he was a scribe of books and was not a hadith scholar. He also said: In another place, he is not that strong
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: May have erred
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Trustworthy, his hadith is sound
Abu Mushir al-Ghassani: He considered him acceptable
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: He is fine
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, may have erred. And once: Most consider him trustworthy
al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy
Dahim al-Dimashqi: Weak. And once: He is not a hadith scholar
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He may have discrepancies in his hadith. And once: He said, he is not strong
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him