Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Among those whose hadiths are written
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: He is not weak
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: Among those who make mistakes and reverse the chains of narration, so when that became widespread in what he narrated, the argument against him was invalidated by what he narrated correctly because of the predominance of what we mentioned about his narration
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Not trustworthy
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Weak in Hadith
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: It was narrated from al-Bukhari that he said: Truthful, except that he may sometimes err in things
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He was asked about his hadith, so he said: I do not know, except that I did not see anything wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Weak, and once: Not trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Abd Allah al-Harawi: Effeminate
Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi: On the authority of Abu Hazim, and Abu al-Zinnad, weak according to them, and his brother Faylih is more reliable than him
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: Weak in Hadith
Salih ibn Muhammad al-Jazara: Weak in Hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: Faylih and his brother Abd al-Hamid were weak, once: He is nothing, he narrated Munkar hadiths
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, once: His hadith is not written, and in the narration of Ibn Mahriz, he said: He was not trustworthy
Yaqub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He was not strong in hadith, and he mentioned him in the chapter of those who are averse to narrating from them, and I used to hear our companions weakening him, including Abd al-Hamid