Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not considered a hafiz (scholar with exceptional memory) by them.
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Some of what he narrates is not supported, and he is among those whose hadiths are recorded.
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: Discredited
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Weak, not considered reliable by the people of Iraq.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadiths are recorded but not used as evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Among those who narrate unique and unusual narrations from reliable sources. This was due to his poor memory and many mistakes. It is not permissible to use his narration as evidence if it is unique. As for what agrees with the trustworthy narrators, he is truthful in the narrations and can be used as evidence.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Scholar of the Quran, scholar of history.
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He considered him weak.
Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He is not considered a hafiz (scholar with exceptional memory) by them.
Abu 'Isa al-Tirmidhi: Trustworthy, and once: Trustworthy hafiz.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Confused in hadith, and once: His hadiths are authentic, and once: Acceptable, and once: Weak in hadith.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: His hadiths are not used as evidence, and once: Weak.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, his memory was affected when he moved to Baghdad. He was a jurist.
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: There is weakness in him, what he narrated in Medina is more authentic than what he narrated in Baghdad.
Salih ibn Muhammad al-Jazrah: He narrated from his father things that others did not.
Abdur Rahman ibn Mahdi: He abandoned him, and once: He did not narrate from him.
Ali ibn al-Madini: What he narrated in Medina is authentic, and what he narrated in Baghdad, the people of Baghdad corrupted it. He was considered weak by our companions.
Amr ibn 'Ali al-Fallas: There is weakness in him, what he narrated in Medina is more authentic than what he narrated in Baghdad.
Malik ibn Anas: He criticized him because of his narration from his father the book of al-Saba'ah, and once: Musa ibn Salamah said: I said to Malik ibn Anas, guide me to a trustworthy man from whom I can write. He said to me, 'Go to Abdur Rahman ibn Abi al-Zinad.'
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: He narrates many hadiths, and he is considered weak because of his narration from his father.
Muhammad ibn 'Umar al-Waqidi: Noble in his knowledge, and a great scholar who narrates many hadiths.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, considered reliable in corroborations and supporting narrations.
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He did not narrate from him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: The most knowledgeable of the people about Hisham ibn 'Urwah, and once: He is not among those whose hadiths are used as evidence by the scholars of hadith, he is not reliable, and once: Weak, and once: There is no problem with him, and once: His hadith is not used as evidence, and he once said: He was not reliable, weak in hadith.
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Siduusi: Trustworthy, truthful, but there is weakness in his hadith.