Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is not followed in his hadith, and he is among those whose hadith is written down
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Lenient in hadith
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Not strong
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates very strange hadiths and transmits things from the trustworthy narrators that do not resemble the hadiths of confirmation. So, I do not know if the abundance of mistakes in his narrations is from him or from his son. However, most of his narrations and the basis of his hadiths revolve around his son, and his son makes grave mistakes. Hence, his case is dubious, and it is necessary to abandon him
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Weak in hadith; some scholars weakened him because of his memorization
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He narrates strange hadiths
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: He is not trustworthy, and once said: Abandoned in hadith
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: He said in al-Taqrib and al-Matalib al-Aliya: Weak
Al-Dhahabi: Weak
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful but with some weakness, which is tolerable
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Khurash: Weak in hadith, not worth anything
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: He narrates strange hadiths
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the author of al-Waqidi: He has weak hadiths
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak in hadith