Abu Bakr Al-Bayhaqi: There is weakness in his narration
Abu Hatim Al-Razi: He is not strong, he narrated a Munkar Hadith
Abu Hatim bin Habban Al-Busti: He is a Munkar (rejected) in Hadith, he narrates what is not followed, and he is not famous for his justice, so what he narrated alone is accepted, but avoiding his narrations is better when seeking evidence
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shaheen: Trustworthy
Abu Dawud Al-Sijistani: He is a Munkar (rejected) in Hadith in my opinion
Abu Zar'ah Al-Razi: He is fine, his Hadiths are straight
Abu Nuaym Al-Asbahani: There is weakness and leniency in him
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Shuayb Al-Nasa'i: He is not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih Al-Jalil: Trustworthy
Al-Daraqutni: He weakened him
Tamam ibn Muhammad Al-Razi: Trustworthy
Hanban ibn Hilal Al-Bahli: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Ismail Al-Bukhari: It was said: He is trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, and once: Trustworthy