Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: In his Hadith there are some things that are rejected and not followed, but most of his Hadiths are Sahih, and he is good in Hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His Hadith is written, but not used as evidence. He is good in Hadith, but not firm or strong
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Very pious
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: Closer to being trustworthy
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: A Qadari, but he is trustworthy
Abu Amr Abdullah al-Ghadani: The people of Morocco say: 'Abbad ibn Ishaq, they may have mistaken
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: As for what we have written of his Hadith, it is Sahih. And once: There is nothing wrong with him. And once: A righteous man, or acceptable. And once: Good in Hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: His Hadith is written, but he is not strong
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Not praised in Hadith
Ismail ibn 'Ulayyah: He was pleased with him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, accused of being a Qadari
Al-Daraqutni: Weak, accused of being a Qadari
Al-Dhahabi: He was very knowledgeable
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, accused of being a Qadari
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: A Qadari
Ali ibn al-Madini: To us, he is fairly good. Yahya ibn Sa'id used to weaken him
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah: There is nothing wrong with him
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: Trustworthy. And once: He is not someone whose memorization is relied upon
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: More firm than al-Wasiti, meaning Muhammad ibn Ishaq
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: I asked about him in Medina, but I did not see them praising him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy. And once: Good. And once: Good in Hadith. And once: Trustworthy, there is nothing wrong with him
Yazid ibn Zurai' al-'Ayshi: What came from Medina is better memorized by him
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: There is nothing wrong with him
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sadusi: Good