Abu Ahmad bin Adi Al-Jarjani: Some of what he narrates is rejected, not followed upon, and he is among those whose hadiths are considered weak.
Abu Al-Qasim Al-Baghawi: Acceptable hadith
Abu Hatim Al-Razi: He is lenient, his hadith is written, but not used as evidence.
Abu Hatim bin Hibban Al-Busti: Among those who narrate uniquely from his father what is not followed upon, with gross errors in his narration. It is not permissible to use his narration as evidence if it is unique.
Abu Zar'ah Al-Razi: Weakened him
Ibrahim bin Ishaq Al-Harbi: Others are more reliable than him
Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani: He said in Hady Al-Sari: Al-Bukhari cited him as evidence, as did Al-Daraqutni, Abu Dawud, Al-Nasa'i, and Al-Tirmidhi.
Al-Daraqutni: In the questions of Abu Abd al-Rahman al-Salami, he said: Al-Bukhari disagreed with the people in citing him as evidence, but he is not abandoned. And once: He only narrated a few hadiths, and he is weak according to others, so he is considered.
Abdul Rahman bin Mahdi: He did not narrate on his own authority.
Ali bin Al-Madini: Truthful
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but considered in corroborations and witnesses.
Yahya bin Ma'in: There is weakness in his hadith, it is enough that Al-Qattan narrated from him. And he once said: Acceptable. Abu Hafs Umar bin Shaheen commented: This statement should be ignored.