Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He does not have many hadiths, and Malik knows him better because he was from Medina and did not narrate anything from him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is not strong, his hadith is written but not considered evidence
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He considered his status strong, and criticized Malik for weakening him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: He is not like that, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, bad memorization, accused of irjaa
Al-Dhahabi: Weak
Abd al-Rahman ibn Muawiyah: Not trustworthy
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was considered trustworthy by us, al-Thawri, Shubah, and Sufyan ibn Uyainah narrated from him
Malik ibn Anas: Not trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: In Abbas's narration: His hadith is not considered evidence, and in al-Darami's narration: Trustworthy